Public response to an anthrax attack: a multiethnic perspective.

The 2001 anthrax attacks emphasized the need to develop outreach that would more effectively support racial/ethnic minority populations during a bioterrorism incident. Given the importance of antibiotic prophylaxis in a future anthrax attack, it should be a priority to better support racial/ethnic minorities in mass dispensing programs. To examine the needs and perspectives of racial/ethnic minorities, this study used a nationally representative poll of 1,852 adults, including 1,240 whites, 261 African Americans, and 282 Hispanics. The poll examined public reactions to a ''worst-case scenario'' in which cases of inhalation anthrax are discovered without an identified source and the entire population of a city or town is asked to receive antibiotic prophylaxis within 48 hours. Findings suggest willingness across all racial/ethnic groups to comply with recommendations to seek prophylaxis at dispensing sites. However, findings also indicate possible barriers for racial/ethnic minorities, including greater concern about pill safety and multiple attacks as well as lesser knowledge about inhalation anthrax. Across all racial/ethnic groups, roughly half would prefer to receive antibiotics at mass dispensing sites rather than through the US Postal Service. People in racial/ethnic minority groups were more likely to say this preference stems from a desire to speak with staff or to exchange medication formulation or type. Findings suggest the need for tailored outreach to racial/ethnic minorities through, for example, emphasis on key messages and enhanced understandability in communications, increased staff for answering questions in relevant dispensing sites, and long-term trust building with racial/ethnic minority communities.

Evaluation of serologic tests for diagnosis of anthrax after an outbreak of cutaneous anthrax in Paraguay.

An outbreak of at least 21 cases of cutaneous anthrax occurred in rural Paraguay. A case-control study revealed that disease was associated with touching the raw meat of an ill cow (odds ration = 16.5, P = .02). Serum drawn from 12 cases and 16 colony and 2 noncolony controls 6 w after the outbreak were analyzed by electrophoretic-immunotransblots (EITB) to detect serum antibodies to the protective antigen (PA) and lethal factor components of anthrax toxin. Serum was also tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the presence of antibodies to poly-D-glutamic acid capsule. Of 12 cases, 11 had a positive PA screen, for a sensitivity of 91.7% (76.1%-100%, 95% confidence interval [CI]) whereas none of the 18 controls was positive for a specificity of 100% (84.8%, one-sided binomial 95% CI). Only 6 (50%) of 12 cases (21.7%-78.3%, 95% CI) had positive lethal factor titers; all controls were negative. At a cutoff of greater than or equal to 1:32 for antibodies to capsule, 11 (91.7%) of 12 (76.1%-100%, 95% CI) were positive; 16 (88.9%) of 18 controls (74.5%-100%, 95% CI) were negative. These data suggest that the EITB for detection of antibody to PA, and ELISA for detection of anticapsule antibodies are both sensitive for the retrospective diagnosis of anthrax. Both tests were specific, but EITB may be more so than ELISA.